Our Reactionary Age
From the New York Times (Op-Editorial)
To live a modern life anywhere in the world today, subject to
perpetual social and technological transformations, is to experience the
psychological equivalent of permanent revolution. Anxiety in the face of this
process is now a universal experience, which is why reactionary ideas attract
adherents around the world who share little except their sense of historical
betrayal.
Mark Lilla—
Mark Lilla’s nice article makes more sense of the election day
angst than all the hours of teeth-gnashing from left leaning CNN journalists and right wing Fox News partisans, the briefest of
tweeters, the longwinded radio tycoons, the neocons, the rabble rousers, the rooftop shouters, the Cubs fans, the Kardashians, The View, the others with an obstructed
view, the great unwashed, The Voice,
those others without a voice, The
Housewives, the white educated ladies in the Philly suburbs, the Latino
voters, the vote suppressors, the Second Amendment gun toters hiding up in the
hills loading up on ammo, Taylor Swift, LeBron James, Jay-Z and Beyonce, the
dog whisperer, the paint sniffers, opioid abusers, Jimmy Fallon and his unnamed
sidekick (Steve Higgins), the victims of micro-aggression, the refugees, the terrorists, the
fellow travelers, not to mention Flo from Progressive, the Mayhem guy and the Good Hands guy, all keeping us safe 24/7 but still we feel so vulnerable.
Lilla’s op-ed makes more sense than almost everybody else—with a
single, powerful exception, a man who speaks to us most eloquently, even from
the grave, the great thinker and media guru Marshall McLuhan.
McLuhan always argued for the need for an awareness of present
circumstances. We must bring to consciousness the vortex of swirling media
energy encircling us. Mcluhan compared the situation to an Edgar Allen Poe
short story, Descent into the Maelstrom,
a cautionary tale in which a fisherman finds himself caught in the midst of a
whirlpool of swirling waters. The
fisherman saves himself by achieving a
moment of clarity in the midst of the whirlpool. The Norwegian fisherman in
Poe’s story gathers himself for a brief moment and, by observing the wild
vortex of energy, ocean waters swirling with debris, finds a solution. He separates from his boat and grabs on to a steamer trunk as a way out of the maelstrom.
McLuhan referred to the story in his first book, The Mechanical Bride, (1951) devoted to
the subject of advertising and written before the real advent of television.
McLuhan the book with a reference to the Poe story, and the hope that his work
will render the maelstrom better understood. Here is McLuhan’s statement:
The present book likewise makes few attempts to attach the
very considerable currents and pressures set up around us today by the
mechanical agencies of the press, radio, movies and advertising. It does
attempt to set the reader at the center of the revolving picture created by
these affairs where he may observe the action that is in progress in which
everybody is involved. From the analysis of that action, it is hoped, many
individual strategies may suggest themselves.
(McLuhan, The Mechanical Bride, preface)
The maelstrom has clearly grown wider, deeper and more ferocious
than in 1951, but McLuhan always retained the Poe story as a core metaphor for
the man’s need to study the vortex of media energy as a means for survival. The
question for the present age—Have we
determined even a single strategy for protecting ourselves from the maelstrom?—unfortunately
remains unanswered.
No comments:
Post a Comment